How to Use YouTube Kids on the Callsky 8” Tablet! 🎥 Videos & Endless Fun for Kids!

Comments (17,718)

1. Looking through the archives suggests this site has been doing this for a while at this level, and a look at votersuppressionshame confirmed the long term consistency, sites that have maintained quality across years rather than just a recent stretch are sites with serious editorial discipline and this one has clearly been at it for a while.

   回复

2. Reading this with my morning coffee turned into reading the related posts with my morning coffee, and a stop at morixoline stretched the morning further, content that pulls breakfast into a reading session rather than just accompanying it is content that has earned a higher claim on my attention than the average article does.

   回复

3. Better signal to noise ratio than most places I check on this kind of topic, and a look at TheSandiegoLeague kept that going, every paragraph here carries something worth reading rather than padding out the page to hit some arbitrary length target that search engines reward but readers ignore as soon as they notice it.

   回复

4. Right — been on this thing for about a few months now and I keep coming back, so figured I’d say something since someone asked me last week. Am based in the UK, mainly stick to footie and the horses, small stakes, just so you know where I’m coming from.

   How I found it was honestly a bit daft — I couldn’t ever get my head round what an e/w return actually came to when the place terms changed. I’d just guess and then be surprised. Now I punch the numbers in first, every time, even a straight one-selection punt.

   The single bet calculator is the one I use most — you put in your stake, the odds and it shows returns instantly, fractional or decimal, doesn’t matter. Same tool covers the multiples — acca and treble maths, lucky 15 and lucky 63, a yankee, honestly that’s where I’d always mess it up. Have a go yourself, it lives at [url=https://single-calculator.com/bet-calculator/kelly-criterion]fractional kelly calculator[/url] and it’s free with no account nonsense.

   One thing that genuinely made a difference was the geekier bits. The odds-to-probability calculator that shows how much the bookie’s taking, and there’s the kelly staking calculator — I stick to fractional kelly because full kelly is far too aggressive. The dutch tool gets used a fair bit for when I’m covering two or three runners.

   Not all sunshine though. The layout feels very functional, let’s say — zero frills, looks like it was built by someone who cares more about maths than colours. Phone-wise it works though the lucky 63 breakdown make you pinch and zoom. Also there’s no app, it’s browser only — fine by me but worth saying.

   So yeah. Costs nowt, not plastered in adverts, does the job. If you even now adds it up in their head, have a look — saves me a load of dumb bets I’d have regretted.

   回复

5. Reading this in the gap between work projects was a small but meaningful break, and a stop at kelvo extended that gentle reset, content that provides genuine refreshment rather than just distraction during work breaks is content with a particular kind of utility and this site fits that role for me reliably during work days.

   回复

6. So — have been messing about with this thing for about five months now and I keep coming back, reckon I’d say something since a mate asked me last week. I’m in the UK, generally bet football and racing, a fiver here and there, for context.

   How I found it was honestly pretty stupid — I never could figure out what an ew payout would be when the place terms changed. Basically I’d wing it and then be surprised. These days I stick my stake in first, every time, even the boring singles.

   Their single bet calculator is the bit I’m on daily — you put in stake and odds and you get profit and total return with no faffing, fractional or decimal, doesn’t matter. Same tool covers the fiddly ones — doubles and trebles returns, lucky 15s, a yankee, which is where I always mess it up. If you want a look, it’s over at [url=https://single-calculator.com/bet-calculator/matched-betting]matched betting matcher[/url] and there’s no login wall, which I appreciated.

   One thing that really made a difference were the nerdier tools. There’s an probability thing which shows you how much the bookie’s taking, and there’s the kelly tool — I use half kelly as the full version is a quick route to a dead bankroll. The dutch tool gets used a fair bit for when I’m spreading across selections.

   It’s not perfect mind. Its design is very functional, let’s say — not much flash, which honestly I don’t mind but some will. On mobile it works although the acca grid are a squeeze. Also there’s nothing on the app store, just the site — fine by me but you asked.

   Right, that’s me. Doesn’t cost anything, not plastered in adverts, does what it says. Anyone who still works out returns on a calculator app, give it a go — it’s saved me plenty of arguments with the bookie.

   回复

7. Reading this gave me a small mental break from the heavier reading I had been doing, and a stop at bantonwoodson extended that lighter feel, content that provides relief without becoming trivial is harder to produce than people realise and this site has clearly figured out how to be light without being shallow at all.

   回复

8. Really appreciate that the writer did not assume I would read every other related post first, and a look at queenmshop kept that self contained feel going where each piece can stand alone, accessibility for new readers is a sign of generous editorial thinking and this site has clearly invested in that approach.

   回复

9. Generally I find the content on similar topics frustrating in specific ways and this post avoided all of them, and a look at xanerobond continued that frustration free experience, content that sidesteps the standard failure modes of its genre is content with editorial awareness and this site has clearly studied what fails elsewhere consistently.

   回复

10. Ya llevo como cinco meses con 888starz y para que mentir entre con la mosca detras de la oreja, porque por aqui uno se cansa de paginas que venden humo. Darse de alta me llevo un rato minimo, correo, contrasena y listo, y el deposito minimo es de 1 euro, que para probar viene de lujo.

    En cuanto a maquinas hay una barbaridad — hablamos de mas de 7.000 juegos repartidos entre Pragmatic Play, NetEnt, Play’n GO, Betsoft y Yggdrasil. Yo me quedo en Sweet Bonanza y Book of Dead, si bien he tocado tambien alguna de Microgaming. Lo que me raya es que el filtro por proveedor a veces se atasca cuando el catalogo es tan bestia.

    El casino en directo esta llevada por Evolution y eso se nota: ruletas con crupieres de verdad, los game shows tipo Crazy Time para el que le guste el show. El bono de bienvenida es de un 130% y unas 100 tiradas gratis, hay que apostarlo x40, que es lo normal del mercado. Suele haber bonos sin deposito de vez en cuando, puedes mirar las condiciones exactas desde [url=https://888starz-es7.com/promocode]888starz casino promo code[/url] antes de registrarte.

    Las retiradas va bastante fino. Saque la semana pasada via e-wallet y entro casi al momento. Con Visa tarda mas, como en todos lados. Van con Neteller, Bitcoin y USDT y ahi es donde vuela de verdad.

    Desde el movil va suave, tienen app para Android pero yo uso el navegador y me sobra. La atencion al cliente esta en espanol, no fue instantaneo pero tampoco eterno la vez que tuve un lio con la verificacion. Operan con licencia de Curazao, no esta regulado por la DGOJ espanola y conviene tenerlo claro. A mi de momento me ha respondido, pero ojo con el rollover de las promos.

    回复